Update (3/13/08): Scans of the “contract” can be found accompanying this article at Ekonomika. Some critics are saying that since there is no Naftogaz stamp over Didenko’s signature, it is not valid and only represents a proposal by RosUkrEnergo. It will be interesting to see how it fits into the new deal just signed in Moscow. (Also, interestingly, the bank account numbers are not whited-out in the pictures accompanying the Kommersant paper edition.)
____
Russia’s natural gas supply cuts to Ukraine last week were lifted after only two days following a vague agreement between Naftogaz and Gazprom that “solv[ed] the crisis situation in the gas area.” However, no solid terms were announced and negotiations are scheduled to continue this week to reach a more official agreement.
An article from today’s edition of Kommersant (shorter English version) has the details of a previously-unknown contract signed between Naftogaz and middleman RosUkrEnergo on March 6th, the day after supplies returned to normal. According to the article, Naftogaz has agreed to repay Gazprom for gas delivered to Ukraine since January 1st on two pay scales: for gas alleged to be of Russian origin, the company will pay $321 per thousand cubic meters (mcm); the remaining volumes, ostensibly from Central Asia, will be calculated from the $179.50 price agreed upon late last year.
While the exact volumes of Russian versus Central Asian gas are still being negotiated, Russian gas could account for roughly 4 billion cubic meters (bcm) out of the 9.1 so far delivered to Ukraine this year. This would put Naftogaz’s average price for gas at $240 per mcm for January and February of this year. Terms for the rest of the year are set to be negotiated starting tomorrow.
The print edition of the paper has partial scans of the faxed contract signed by vice chairman Igor Didenko of Naftogaz (interestingly, not the company’s head, Oleg Dubina) and RosUkrEnergo’s executive directors Dmitry Glebko and Konstantin Chuichenko (who is also on Gazprom’s board). I haven’t been able to find pictures of the contract online, however.
Gazprom is allegedly taking this as evidence of Naftogaz’s financial ability to pay for gas at European prices, and may press this issue during upcoming negotiations. (Ukraine may very well respond by demanding “European” prices for gas transit.)
Didenko apparently agreed to this price–which was higher even than the $315.50 price Gazprom was trying to charge–in order to pave the way for the removal of Ukrgazenergo (a 50/50 joint venture between RUE and Naftogaz) from Ukraine’s internal market. Paying for Russian gas at European prices has been an unofficial demand by Gazprom for acquiescence on the removal of middlemen within the gas supply scheme.
However, an analyst quoted in the Kommersant article suggested that this situation may create a two-tiered system, where Ukrgazenergo sells the gas it receives from RUE for $178.50 and Naftogaz sells “Russian” gas bought for $321. Given the price difference, it is hard to believe that Naftogaz would be able to compete commercially with Ukrgazenergo on the internal market.
Prime Minister Yuila Tymoshenko’s government has been actively working to “liquidate” Ukrgazenergo, to the benefit of Naftogaz. Ukraine’s National Energy Regulating Commission attempted to severely limit Ukrgazenergo’s allotted market share within Ukraine (from about 35 bcm per year to 5 bcm), and a suit on the issue between the commission and the gas trader is currently awaiting a hearing in Kyiv’s overworked administrative court. Tymoshenko’s vice premier asserted today that Ukrgazenergo’s license for the sale of gas at non-regulated prices had been revoked, but the company responded by calling him a liar.
Naftogaz responded to the article with a press release stating that Naftogaz isn’t going to be buying any “Russian” gas anyway, so the price isn’t a big deal (my translation):
Naftogaz notes that the publicized information relating to the purchase of Russian gas for Ukrainian consumers at the price of $321 per mcm is counter to the agreement reached between the Presidents of Ukraine and Russia and does not respond to reality. In the balance of the company [Naftogaz] for this year, there are no plans for selling volumes of Russian gas to Ukrainian consumers. According to the energy customs service, this year gas of Russian origin is not being cleared [растаможивался] into the Ukrainian customs territory
If indeed gas of Russian origin is not being sold within Ukraine, this would suggest it is instead either re-exported into Europe or being kept in storage. Though if Russian volumes of gas did make up 4 bcm out of the 9 bcm bought by Ukraine this year, it is hard to believe that domestic demand could have been satisfied by only the remaining 5 bcm of imports. (This underscores the difficulties in determining the origin of gas pumped through pipelines, particularly in the absence of clearly-delineated contracts and volumes.)
Assuming the price structure is expanded into the future, Naftogaz may be planning on simply re-exporting any gas it is forced to buy at “Russian” prices. It would then rely on the cheaper Central Asian blend (and domestic production) to supply internal consumers. In past years, the price of the gas “cocktail” supplied by RosUkrEnergo to Ukraine had included the cost of significantly higher-priced volumes of Russian gas. It is unclear why this year’s scheme has Russian gas being charged outside the system.
The negotiating delegation–which includes Didenko–plans to ensure that the price remains $179.50 during talks that resume in Moscow tomorrow. Bowing to the $315 Russian price for gas already delivered had been fodder in a public argument between Tymoshenko and President Yushchenko over the handling of gas issues.
Tymoshenko had claimed success at having escaped from the gas shut-off situation without agreeing to paying higher-than-contracted prices. She also intimated that Yushchenko was willing to accept the price Russia suggested. Yushchenko’s secretariat responded by posting the directives he had given her prior to her recent trip to Moscow, which included doing everything possible to secure the $179.50 price–steps that Yushchenko himself had taken during his own meeting with Putin earlier this year.
While Tymoshenko also wants a low price, she has stressed that any future deal should remove both RosUkrEnergo and Ukrgazenergo. She has been hesitant to endorse a plan to replace them with joint ventures between Naftogaz and Gazprom. It will be interesting to see what aspects of the President’s and Prime Minister’s visions for the gas scheme are stressed by the negotiating team–and eventually accepted by Gazprom.
“Gazprom is allegedly taking this as evidence of Naftogaz’s financial ability to pay for gas at European prices, and may press this issue during upcoming negotiations. (Ukraine may very well respond by demanding “European” prices for gas transit.)”
If not in this year’s contract then definitely next years as central asian gas prices will be at european levels starting 2009.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKL1185786120080311
Bummer will be to pay european prices and still have two page annual contracts with shady gas intermediaries. Argh 😦
The Kommersant article on the new Central Asian prices for next year quoted an official in Gazprom talking about how it wasn’t fair for Central Asian countries to subsidize the economy of Ukraine. Makes it sounds like Russia had no involvement in the scheme and wasn’t itself benefiting from cheap gas from Turkmenistan.
I wonder what this does to Turkmenistan’s deal with China…
Ah the all important pechatka.
“The agreement setting the gas price for Naftogaz of Ukraine at $321 per 1,000 cubic meters is not valid, the company’s press office told RBC Ukraine. The copy of this agreement, while sealed by RosUkrEnergo, lacks Naftogaz of Ukraine’s seal, which means that RosUkrEnergo has suggested the conditions, but does not mean the company has accepted them, the source pointed out.”
http://www.rbcnews.com/free/20080312192419.shtml
Ques.: where did the price $130 come from? Isn’t it the 2006 price? And was not all of 2007 gas already paid up for?
“Tymoshenko also said that under the instructions Ukraine would pay a maximum of $130 for every 1,000 cubic meters of gas consumed last year.”
http://en.rian.ru/world/20080312/101181350.html
This is NOT going to get settled anytime soon, is it?
“Talks held between Russia and Ukraine aimed at settling their natural gas dispute have stalled, a Ukrainian source close to negotiations told ITAR-TASS Wednesday. … Naftogaz Ukrainy declined to comment on the current state of the talks but said they might continue on Thursday.”
http://www.prime-tass.com/news/show.asp?topicid=68&id=435000
Ques: Where did she get the $130 price from??? Was that not 2006 prices? And was not all owed for 2007 already paid up to Gazprom?
“Tymoshenko also said that under the instructions Ukraine would pay a maximum of $130 for every 1,000 cubic meters of gas consumed last year.”
http://en.rian.ru/world/20080312/101181350.html
I wonder if the gas talks are going to get resolved once Tymo gets fired. No way would she want to the PM in office when the negotiated price goes above $300. And it seems that Gazprom will not accept anything less than that for gas consumed in Jan. and Feb., as well as having some intermediaries.
oops – sorry delete duplicate post.
And according to Tymoshenko in talks today price of gas settled at $179 and there will be no intermediaries. (looking for confirmation from Gazprom or other news story to confirm)
http://unian.net/ukr/news/news-240781.html
If true complete victory for Tymoshenko.